Other Trees


Other Trees

Announcements

27 May 2025

Hi All,Mobile app update is nearing release which brings:Improved taxonomy search accuracyAbility to re-order images using drag and dropMinor bug fixesWeb platform improvements that are nearing releas...


Continue reading

Platform update

Improvements to data import tool (coming soon)

NatureMapr welcomes Edgar McNamara

Platform wide attribute changes

Discussion

6 hrs ago
References:

• Flora of NSW online PlantNet:
PlantNET (The NSW Plant Information Network System).
_Backhousia_ genus page including key to NSW spp.: https://plantnet.rbgsyd.nsw.gov.au/cgi-bin/NSWfl.pl?page=nswfl&lvl=gn&name=Backhousia
_Backhousia myrtifolia_ Hook. & Harv. (1845) : https://plantnet.rbgsyd.nsw.gov.au/cgi-bin/NSWfl.pl?page=nswfl&lvl=sp&name=Backhousia~myrtifolia
Royal Botanic Gardens and Domain Trust, Sydney.
Viewed: 2025 May 31st .

Backhousia myrtifolia
12 hrs ago
A coincidence this morning:
As an example of my own sometimes making mistakes by myself not doing enough careful checking,
even as I have skills and have experienced knowledge of this species;
as well as perhaps not experienced with this species while having experience with P. rubiginosum: @Tapirlord and yourself.
Even though we all have skills and plants' spp. identification experiences.

Thus this sighting identification corrected:
actually a flowering smalller plant than its full potential tree form;
with much more height–growth potential it has yet to realise,
identifies to _Pittosporum wingii_ !!!

Good humbling for us all – including us always take care more and more.

The reasoning available here – especially the distribution of hairiness compared with _Pittosporum rubiginosum_ :
https://keybase.rbg.vic.gov.au/keys/show/966

I am now uploading my own many sightings of some of the _Pittosporum_ species of this wet tropics bio-region (NE. Qld) .

Pittosporum wingii
13 hrs ago
Yeah. Good morning!
And, please include written notes in to the NatureMapr sighting record,
of your sighting time actual in the field relevant thoughts.

Systematic notes have interest (not boring).
And as your NatureMapr time permits, please include your relevant thoughts (not holding thoughts back).

Evidences–based and first hand experiences based inferences and opinions –great!
Un-evidenced, made–up, guessed, assumed, or hyped up, opinions waste every bodies' time.
Thanks to us all here in NatureMapr there's very few, a tiny minority, of these here
(cf. bad, large minority proportion of baseless IDs and records in iNat).
Boldly i am emphasising, in this our nature loving systematic life–work, none of us can fall into guessing nor assuming nor hyping.

Melia azedarach
820,315 sightings of 22,423 species from 14,131 members
CCA 3.0 | privacy
We acknowledge the Traditional Owners of this land and acknowledge their continuing connection to their culture. We pay our respects to their Elders past and present.